Start from
η, the coding automation efficiency improvement, was estimated at λ 0.5. The variant rescales it for coding labor growth after today; the original model's power form is offered for comparison.
Starting…
When each milestone arrives
Preset λ Two-λ Original, one λ
Effective capability over time
Preset λ Two-λ Original, one λ
log10 effective training compute. Dotted lines are the milestone thresholds.
Milestone table
How to read this
- λ is the return to parallel coding labor: doubling it multiplies serial labor by 2λ. The original model uses one λ for historical human teams and future AI swarms alike.
- With one λ, raising it also changes two calibrations of the past: today's measured coding uplift is read as less automation, and returns to software research (r) are refit to 2024 progress. Both lengthen takeoff and can outweigh the direct benefit.
- The two-λ variant keeps both calibrations at λ 0.5, so today's automation and r are unchanged, and applies the forward λ only to growth in coding labor after today.
- λ rising over time moves the forward λ from its value today to a higher one over the chosen period. A rise applies to all coding labor growth since today, so better coordination also helps the agents already running. η is rescaled for today's forward λ only. With no rise this is the fixed forward λ. The variant line uses the schedule; the dotted original-model line uses the forward λ alone.
- AC is the automated coder and ASI artificial superintelligence, as defined by the AI Futures Model. Takeoff is the time from AC to ASI. Coding Uplift anchor.
- The original model accepts λ up to 1. Everything is solved in your browser with Pyodide. Source and method: aifm-rising-lambda, built on aifm-lambda-fixes.